Kodak HC-110 vs. Agfa Rodinal

I previously pushed Kodak T-Max 400 (135 format) to ISO 1600 by using dilution B (1+31) of Kodak HC-110. The results were okay but not perfect. I compare the results to Kodak D-76 (1+1) which I used during the summer. HC-110 didn’t perform as good as D-76. I have used a lot of Agfa Rodinal but I’ve tried only once to push T-Max with it (ISO 800 in 1-hour stand).

Someone told me to use HC-110 in another dilution (unofficial H, 1+63) and I also found a great Rodinal 1+25 recipe to try. So, I shot a test roll of T-Max. At first I thought I would shoot the roll with repeating same frame (same settings, same focus, same composition, on tripod of course), cut the film in three parts and develop each part differently. It would have made the test more stable and “scientific” but I wanted to see how the results would change if the subject or the camera settings were different. So, here’s what I did. I quickly shot 14 frames around the house with Nikon F100 and AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.8D in aperture priority mode and marked down the aperture value and the subject. Then I shot 8 frames more freely (the cat was there so I took photos of her) and marked down the aperture values. And then I shot 14 frames again, of the same subjects with the same aperture values as before to get, at least, very similar photo pairs. The pairs were taken within 10 minutes of each other. In the darkroom I cut the film in two pieces and put one part into one tank and the other part into another tank.

Development notes: The first half of the film was developed in Kodak HC-110, dilution H (1+63), for 18 minutes in 20°C. The tank was agitated the tank for 30 seconds and then one inversion every minute. The second half of the film was developed in Agfa Rodinal 1+25, for 12 minutes in 20°C. The tank was agitated slowly/carefully for 30 seconds and then one slow inversion every minute.

Both parts of the film were scanned and post-processed similarly. I used SilverFast SE software with Negafix set to Linear (no film profile used), and scanned at 2400 dpi without auto sharpening. In Photoshop I desaturated the frames (they had purple tint), cropped off the edges and removed the largest dust spots. No other post-processing was applied.

Here are some of the photo pairs (do not mind about the lack of proper contents). The HC-110 example is always on the left, and the Rodinal example is on the right. Click to enlarge.

HC-110 on the left, Rodinal on the right, shot with f/4

Aperture: f/4

HC-110 on the left, Rodinal on the right, shot with f/2

Aperture: f/2

HC-110 on the left, Rodinal on the right, shot with f/16

Aperture: f/16

HC-110 on the left, Rodinal on the right, shot with f/1.8

Aperture: f/1.8

The last photo pair is from the eight frames I took in between the real pairs.

HC-110 on the left, Rodinal on the right, shot with f/1.8

Aperture: f/1.8

The photos are small but can you tell which are your favorite? I like the Rodinal photos more because the contrast is (in my opinion) more balanced. The HC-110 photos are not bad either, for example in most of the HC-110 photos the black parts are darker, thus better. HC-110 dilution H is clearly much better than dilution B for pushing.

On the Beach

On the beach in October

Something went terribly wrong with this Kodak T-Max 400 film roll which I shot with Minolta Hi-matic 7s range finder camera. Either the camera metered the light wrong (causing and under exposure) or the development time I found for T-Max 400 and HC-110 combination is far off. I’ve added quite a lot of light to most of these frames.

I rated the film at ISO320 in the camera (like in the test roll) because of the battery voltage. And these were taken on the same day as I shot my first roll of Kodak Portra 800. I had a yellow filter in front of the lens in the photos I took outside. Sand looks very very weird in black and white if you shoot through yellow or orange filter.

Too dark

High contrast

High contrast sand

Katja

The traditional 'my feet' shot

Opel

The frame below that I shot without the yellow filter has the best tones and is generally in better balance. I think the developing time was too long for shots taken with yellow filter.

Lissu

Development notes: developed in Kodak HC-110 (B dilution, 1+31) in 20°C for 6 minutes. Agitated for 30 seconds and then 5 seconds every 30 seconds. Fixed for about 7 minutes. Wetting agent as final bath like always.

Pushing Kodak T-Max with Kodak HC-110

Previously I successfully processed some Kodak T-Max 400 film with Kodak D-76 developer by pushing (under exposing, over developing) it by one and two stops. I didn’t like Kodak D-76 developer because I found it awkward to mix it from powder. It suited very well for T-Max 400 and Rollei Retro 100, though. Anyways, I bought a bottle of Kodak HC-110 and I’m starting to study how to use it, mainly with Kodak films.

I have to say that the first run with HC-110 was decent but not good. I processed two rolls of T-Max 400 film: one shot at box speed (a post coming soon) and another shot at ISO 1600. Next, I will shoot a T-Max 400 roll at ISO 800.

Here are some frames from the Kodak T-Max 400 roll that I shot at ISO 1600. I think I’m close to good results. See the development notes at the end of the post. The roll was shot with Nikon EM camera with Nikon Series E lenses 50mm f/1.8 and 28mm f/2.8.

Self portrait

Katja and I

Bedroom

Bedroom 2

In the mirror again, on a different day

Baby

Katja

Photos below are there to see the grain and the tones. Contents is not important.

Stuff on the desk

Lissu

Board game

Gordy's camera strap

Development notes: a film was shot at ISO 1600 which required a 2-stop push. I used Kodak HC-110 developer with dilution B (1+31) at 20°C. The development time was 8:30 (info found here). The tank was agitated for 30 seconds and then 5 seconds every 30 seconds (slow wine glass circles).